2012/6/22 Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:30:57 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: >
> > If you're replying to my post you removed too much of the quoted text ;-) > >> I admit that I have never extensively used OpenLDAP but, when we did our >> initial research, the feedback seemed to be that it could be unwieldy to >> manage and that the support had a tendency to be cantankerous and >> arrogant. In contrast, the Directory Server support has been amazing >> both on the mailing lists and on IRC - John > > So you mean one of the reasons that lead you to the change (in your case) > was not specifically a technical one nor limited capability of the > OpenLDAP solution but more a support issue? > > That's also something important to take into account, mainly when you're > going to deploy a large installation for a company. Good to know. > by the Directory Server, you meant 389 Directory Server?? -- Regards, Umarzuki Mochlis http://debmal.my -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cahw9mbxqjg5etxt83dqgkx3rveovhjifz4twbxhnv3s5ur4...@mail.gmail.com
