On Wednesday 08 October 2003 12:10, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:04:01AM +0000, Adam wrote:
>> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 08:00, Lukas Ruf wrote:
(1)
>> > find <path> -type f | xargs chmod 0644
>>
>> I would have come up with
>>
(2)
>> find PATH -type f -exec chmod 0644 '{}' ';'
>>
>> Is the version with xargs better, and how?
>
> The version with xargs is much better: it runs a single instance of
> chmod with all the files (or as many as will fit) as arguments, rather
> than running a separate instance of chmod for every file.
So version (1) involves only three processes: find, xargs, chmod; whereas
version (2) spawns find and then a chmod process for every file that
matches -- is that right?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
