On Thursday 09 October 2003 01:08, Philipp Weis wrote: > On 08 Oct 2003, Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To make it pass if security or abuse is in, I could only extend > > accept local_parts = postmaster to accept local_parts = > > postmaster:abuse:security, right? > > Right.
Yup, that works great, thanks a lot! > > It wouldn't be a problem in my other case either, with the > > spamtraps: If one of the spamtraps are among the local_parts, I'll > > reject it anyway, as none of the spamtraps will ever get legitimate > > mail. I would not need to differentiate between users in either > > case. > > > > However, this seems harder now, since, as you said, local_parts is > > not available in DATA ACL... Would I need to set it up in the RCPT > > ACL section to set a variable, and then test on that in the DATA > > ACL section? > > If I got you right, you want to deny all mail sent to a spamtrap > recipient. This should work exactly the same way as with postmaster. Uhm, I was probably a bit confused last night... What I meant to say is that I will accept the mail if it goes only to a spamtrap, but deny it if it also goes to a user which is not in the list of spamtraps... So, I don't need to differentiate between users, but I need some kind of condition if there are other users getting that mail than the spamtraps... BTW, I probably misconfigured clamd somewhat, because tonight the mailserver started refusing more connections. It apparently had too much to scan. I'm working on that right now. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
