On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:48:41 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Sat 26 May 2012 at 15:53:03 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 May 2012 16:26:34 +0100, Brian wrote:
>> > I have a feeling you may have returned to "PostScript is a raw >> > language, no conversion is needed between the doc and the printer . . >> > . ." idea. Hope I'm wrong. >> >> No, you're not, . . . > > Taking this statement, and the previous one, it is evident you are > basing an argument on the behaviour of a filtering method in CUPS which > has not existed in Debian (and Redhat and Suse) for at least three > years. We have different understandings, which make it impossible to > compare two different conclusions in a meaningful way. Basically, a > conclusion derived from a view of reality which is wrong is without any > validity. This is not a Debian specific behavior nor related to how CUPS works in different distributions. It's about the difference between a PostScript driver/printer and PCL (or another printer languages), and the differences are *huge*. > . . . but this is not going to help the OP to solve his problem. > > He can make his own mind up on that. I'd like think there is enough in > this thread to get him started. Let's hope so. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jpr568$dh7$1...@dough.gmane.org
