On 10/05/12 16:45, Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 10/05/12 16:14, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > >> So, this message was signed. > >> Having recently installed enigmail, to see what all the fuss is about >> in the other thread. I find I'm at a loss to understand how to >> interpret this. >> ------------------------------------------------- >> OpenPGP Security Info > >> Unverified signature > >> gpg command line and output: >> /usr/bin/gpg >> gpg: Signature made Thu 10 May 2012 15:27:47 BST using RSA key ID A093C263 >> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found >> ------------------------------------------------- > >> Am I expected to go to some keyserver to find the sender's public key? >> How, where, why? > >> Maybe I've not set up Enigmail correctly? > >> Alternatively, should I just ignore the signature, in which case why >> is the sender polluting the list with useless crap? > > You have an option to import my key under your PGP menu should you wish > to do so . If you have installed Enigmail then go ahead & do it. > > However, if you have no wish to use PGP & see it as "polluting the list > with useless crap?", I suggest you uninstall Enigmail. Or you could > continue to be incensed over a dozen or so lines of PGP & keep Enigmail > for some other purpose. > As I suspected... -- Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org Buckinghamshire, England |
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fabe349.7020...@vanderhoff.org
