On Mi, 28 mar 12, 15:55:20, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > >How exactly does this contradict the Release Notes? > > > 1/ The upgrade process for other releases recommended the use of aptitude > for the upgrade. "recommended" (past tense)
> This is in chapter 4: Upgrades from Lenny, so seems to actually apply to > major system upgrades. > > 2/ apt-get ... and is the preferred program for package management from > console to perform > system installation and major system upgrades "is" (present) > Do you mean that 1/ does not contradict 2/ ? > If so, I have to go back to school to better understand English... Or me :) Please feel free to suggest improvements in the wording. A patch would be even better, but I'd be willing to do that on your behalf (with your permission and proper credit, of course). Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
