Hi all I'm trying to put the MythTV PVR XBMC version on my Shuttle box. I need a newer alsa version than the one from Squeeze because the stable version doesn't see the soundcard. So I wanted to install alsa from testing. And because I use a SSD I thought it would be a good idea to use the squeeze-backports kernel.
What do you think it would be better to completely go with testing. There are two reasons why I didn't want to do this: First I need to compile the jme module manually to be able to use the network interface. So I thought the less changes to the kernel makes me less often compile that module again. Second the XBMC version I want to install needs libboost version 1.47 or older. So I thought I'd go with Stable, the kernel from backports and alsa from testing. Unfortunately this doesn't work. I suppose my problem are wrong apt- preferences numbers or something like this. Here's my sources.list: http://pastebin.com/5SQhvDqw And apt preferences: http://pastebin.com/VcndLA6C And here's the error I get when I try to install linux-headers-686-pae from squeeze-backports: http://pastebin.com/RcAPE36t The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-headers-686-pae : Depends: linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-686-pae but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Yesterday I had the problem with alsa but today witchcraft made the problem with alsa disappear but the one with the kernel header and as well build-essential appear. Is this really a problem of the apt pinning numbers? Or what can you suggest me to do? Maybe stick with the stable kernel and compile alsa from source? Best regards Ramon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jkhpge$2h0$1...@dough.gmane.org
