On Monday 19 March 2012 12:32:19 Jochen Spieker wrote: > Lisi: > > Surely it is worth following the earlier suggestion and doing an > > "aptitude full-upgrade" before trying more complicated things? > > The OP has explicitly has explicitly stated that he/she is interested in > the reason for the behaviour. Work-arounds are too easy. :) > > J.
It's NOT a workaround. It is correct usage. In aptitude if you want _everything_ upgraded, you have to say so, otherwise it will safe-upgrade and nothing will be removed, and some things will not be updated. I am suggesting using correct aptitude procedure before trying workarounds. The reason for the behavior is apt-get != aptitude. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203191513.31560.lisi.re...@gmail.com
