On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:09:10PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: > I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For my work, > archived documents & templates this is working out better, for my use > scenario, > than LO ver 3.4.x and later.
That's interesting. Do you mean there are things you can open with AOO that won't open with LO? That surprises me, because I was under the impression that LO had moved on *a lot* from OO, and AOO had not. So either I'm wrong, or LO has regressed in some cases. > There are differences between AOO & LO, significant enough to warrant having > a > choice in Debian of which one to use. Someone will have to step up and put the work in to package AOO, for the choice to exist "in Debian". -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120311232751.GB6759@debian
