On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you >>>>> can complain about tracker. >>>> >>>> More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as >>>> requirement "now". It was not just a few weeks ago. >>> >>> This requirement comes from upstream. >> >> (...) >> >> Any document to support that statement? > > Tom is right. > gnome-documents is in the official set of apps for GNOME 3.2 [1] and the > gnome meta package is just following upstream here.
I don't have all that packages installed in wheezy. > That said, it's a meta package. If you don't like it, don't use it. I wish it were that simple. The metapackage has changed its requirements, now it can't be removed so easily. > Michael > > [1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/ Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jhe3c9$p4f$1...@dough.gmane.org
