In linux.debian.user, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:43:42AM -0400, Michael C. wrote: > > You realize of course that probably 60-70% are dynamic IPs. For example: > > > > 212.216.176.206 212.216.176.221 212.216.176.222 212.216.176.223 > > 212.216.176.224 212.227.126.251 > > > > Are probably one or two people. My ISP usually increments the last > > number of my IP by one if I disconnect and reconnect. It's some poor > > sap, that can't understand why his connection is so fscking slow, and > > thinks if he disconnects and reconnects he'll get a better connection. > > Yes, I know, but a lot of them are SMTP servers. The point is, I *am* > making headway against the virus deluge this way. It Works For Me, > YMMV, batteries not included, some assembly required. > Yes, it works, but you'll be adding IPs daily.
> > Tommorrow someone else will be assigned those same IPs and you'll be > > blocking them even if they were never vulnerable to begin with. > > If it's a problem, they email me, and I pull the IP. If you don't accept email from the recipient, emailing you with the problem, ain't going to be easy. They need to use a different account. By the time you take action, they've logged out, and when they dial in again they'll get a different IP. And the next day someone else with the IP that you unblocked has a virus. Michael C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mcsuper5.freeshell.org/ Registered Linux User #303915 http://counter.li.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
