On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:34:46 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: >> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:16:55 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: >> >>>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:57:06 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:04:37 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
(...) >> How is that Fedora does not have an external repository for the 64 bits >> version of the plugin? That sounds unbelievable :-? > > > They do, but Fedora is very strict with their repositories and the > contents (apps, drivers, plugins, etc.): Open Source only, whether 32 or > 64-bit, with source available. Anything proprietary like Flash, or > where source isn't available, must be in third party ones, and is > unsupported by Fedora. In other words: "Use at Your Own Risk." The same happens in Debian. > Adobe has its own Fedora repository, many software developers do, but > it's all 32-bit. As far as I know, Adobe has no 64-bit repository for > sotware or plugins. Of course, I haven't checked in a couple of years. You mean this YUM source? http://get.adobe.com/es/flashplayer/completion/?installer=Flash_Player_11_for_other_Linux_(YUM)_64-bit What I don't know if it is working right now :-? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jgjv9k$273$2...@dough.gmane.org
