On 2012-01-01 17:46 +0100, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:20:25 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2012-01-01 15:33 +0100, Camaleón wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 11:29:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: >>> >>>> On 2011-12-31 21:41 +0100, Dean Allen Provins, P. Geoph. wrote: >>>> >>>> That's why I suggested to log in from a second computer via ssh. It's >>>> hard to do anything with a blank screen. >>> >>> I guess blacklisting nouveau module should have be done from "init 1" >>> with no running X session at all. >> >> Booting with "init 1" does not prevent the module from being loaded. > > (...) > > I haven't expressed myself right. I didn't want to say "booting at init 1 > to prevent the nuvó module from being loaded" but once the system has > booted (with KMS disabled) jump to "init 1" and blacklist the module from > there.
There is no reason why you would need to switch to runlevel 1 for that. Besides, changing the bootloader configuration to permanently add the "nomodeset" kernel parameter might be better than blacklisting the module. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nwficnu....@turtle.gmx.de
