On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:28:26PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Stephen Allen wrote: > > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Stephen Allen wrote: > > > > I don't use the Debian Chromium as it's too old. > > > > > > I think you must be thinking of the Chromium in Stable Squeeze which > > > released with version 6. That isn't the one under discussion. Stable > > > is stable and so that one won't be changing by intent. > > > > Browsers should be updated as they can be quite volatile. Therefore > > a fast moving target. > > Obviously by all of my postings about mozilla.debian.net I am in > complete agreement with you. However others disagreed and darn them > they pushed the browsers into Testing and Stable anyway. Let's simply > agree to ignore them. It would be much better if those were in the > squeeze-updates section aka the old volatile section. You should > become a DD yourself and then work to move the browsers to those > sections. > > All of that is a completely different topic from Stable Squeeze being > a security release only archive until the next major Stable Wheezy > release. Stable means stable. Thrashing there is very bad. That is > incompatible with our view of the current browser situation. Let's > not lobby for making changes to the stable archive. That is what the > squeeze-updates section is for. > > Bob ---end quoted text---
Yup updated versions of all 3 branches of Chromium should be in Squeeze-Updates IMHO. But since they aren't I've had to resort to using Ubuntu's PPA's which are actually quite reliable. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111130140334.GA10573@sda-ThinkPad-X41
