Thank You for Your time and answer, Martin:

>Huh? Well compared to SSD they are dog slow with small size random 
>read/write operations - typical refered to as IOPS - but I cannot
>confirm that they are slower than PATA drives. They might not be that
>much faster, but thats IMHO more a question of the physical attributes
>of their mechanics.

I agree. That's what I want to solve. So for farther discussion let's
just have as initial data: SATA HDD lacks performance on a system and
we are looking for solutions. - Just to avoid the comparison of the
standards.

>As far as I have seen and measured, SATA drivers in the kernel operate 
>almost at hardware speeds. libata is a quite mature and performant
>driver framewark as far as I have seen.

How do measure? W/ hdparm?

>That said there might be exceptions with certain boards or
>controllers. So if SATA is measurably slower on your machine than PATA
>it might be an idea to replace the SATA controller or the board with
>something sensible.

It is not the case for now - what I said was long ago and I have no
more those machines. Why I said that is just to share my experience w/
S/P -ATA HDDs performance in Linux. And that's it.

>Exactly. Please start with supplying the information I requested in
>the other mail.

OK. Please check it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e9b0ef8.4364cc0a.3714.ffff9...@mx.google.com

Reply via email to