On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:30 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:46:00 +0200 > Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote: > > Hello Martin, > > > Aside from that Konqueror should still work as a file browser as well > > Whilst that is true, in KDE3 Konqueror had better functionality than it > does in KDE4. Specifically, the ability to have different viewing > profiles according to display mode (as file browser). That is, in icon > mode, I had konq set up to show only icons, but in list mode, it > displayed hidden files too. Can't do that any more. :-(
I want my KDE3 back, since I now need to watch GNOME2 dying :(. For me it was a hard decision to switch from KDE3 to GNOME2, because I don't like KDE4. And now GNOME2 will become GNOME3, another kind of KDE4 [snip] :(. There are some other DEs that are ok, but if the next DE I should use, should become a KDE4-GNOME3-thingy, I'll run berserk. 2 Cents, Ralf PS: Yes, Konqueror isn't Konqueror anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1318009177.11998.30.camel@debian
