On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 04:37:11 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 17:33 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:06:31 +0100, Andrew Wood wrote: >> >> > I thought Wheezey was still on Gnome 2.30, not even 2.32? >> >> I guessed the OP was using an Evolution from another distribution. > > Current Evolution for testing's GNOME 2.30.2 is 3.0.3.
Yes, but the OP could be using another EVO not packaged by Debian. > If you've got friends who are journalists in China, than you better > don't use Evolution. You might use the undo option and this will send > the email, before you encrypted it, so this little bug might be the > cause that your friends will be killed by the Chinese government. I can understand that you have been hit by Evo recently but hey, we all have bad days and we all now software can fail. I don't know what that "undo" function is all about but if it does what I think it does (similar to Gmail's undo ability) then I would not rely on it, I mean, on the function, not the program. You can't blame the "messenger" :-) >> > Ive been trying 3.0 out on Fedora and think its great ( Gnome 3 that >> > is not Fedora ;) A few rough edges on the new System Prefs app but >> > nothing that wont be polished up in time. >> >> If you like GNOME 3 + gnome-shell then you're fortunate. > > GNOME 3 will bring us a lot of pain :(. More than GNOME 3 I'd say gnome-shell. GNOME 3 is quite good in wheezy. > Fortunately there are a lot of discussions about the DE that will > replace GNOME for many people, as soon as GNOME 2 will be dropped. I will give GNOME 3 (gnome-shell) a chance but I don't discard moving to another desktop (or even try luck with a WM) in the event it becomes something unable to deal with. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.10.02.09.42...@gmail.com
