On Monday 29 August 2011 13:29:49 Tom H wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Lisi <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was under the impression that I had cleansed my system of rpcbind after > > the security discussion on this list. Today, because I was trying to > > remove Samba, I ran nmap to see what was going on. Here is the > > "conversation" I had with Tux just now: > > > > lisi@Tux:~$ nmap Tux > > Starting Nmap 4.62 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-08-29 10:31 BST > > Interesting ports on Tux (192.168.0.2): > > Not shown: 1711 closed ports > > PORT STATE SERVICE > > 22/tcp open ssh > > 80/tcp open http > > 111/tcp open rpcbind > > 6881/tcp open bittorrent-tracker > > > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.126 seconds > > lisi@Tux:~$ which rpcbind > > lisi@Tux:~$ whereis rpcbind > > rpcbind: > > lisi@Tux:~$ locate rpcbind > > lisi@Tux:~$ find rpcbind > > find: `rpcbind': No such file or directory > > lisi@Tux:~$ > > CHeck whether the rpcbind or the portmap packages are installed.
I have portmap, but not rpcbind. Would that explain why that port is open? I seem to have nothing left of rpcbind and its configuration/data files etc. The other three are open fpr identifiable (by me) reasons. But why is that rpcbind one still open? The computer has been completely shutdown between wehn I removed rpcbind and now. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201108291654.05684.lisi.re...@gmail.com
