Volkan YAZICI <yazic...@ttmail.com> writes: > ,===========. eth0 ,-------. > || internet || <-----------------> | reyiz | > `===========' 10.10.98.100 `-------' > ^ > eth1 | 192.168.100.100 > | > | > | > ,-------. eth3 | > | pampa | <----------------------------+ > `-------^ 192.168.100.98 > > [...]
So there are a lot of hosts not shown on the scheme? > reyiz# route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 10.10.98.96 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.98 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 > 0.0.0.0 10.10.98.110 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > > The problem here is that there exists two entries in the routing table > for 0.0.0.0 network pointing to both eth0 and eth1. But I just want to > have 192.168.100.0 network requests to be handled by eth1, the rest > should be redirected to eth0. There are no 0.0.0.0 networks, only 192.168.100.0 and 10.10.98.96. Try 'route' instead of 'route -n' ... -- html messages are obsolete -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uxrd4st....@yun.yagibdah.de
