On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm still with lenny (now oldstable) but I was even told that not all > security flaws reached votatile, just some, depending of the nature of > the flaw... > > And again, if this policy has recently changed is more than very welcome, > my clamav is also claiming for an update and oldstable is still supported. > If you are running oldstable, I don't know where you'll find a current statement on what goes into volatile. It is really a different repo than squeeze-updates. The statement for squeeze-updates repo purpose makes it very clear it isn't for security: http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg00000.html Quote: * The update is urgent and not of a security nature. Security updates will continue to be pushed through the security archive.
