Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com> writes: > On 22/06/11 21:53, Camaleón wrote: >>> On 21/06/11 23:29, Camaleón wrote: >>>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:21:01 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: >>>>> But at least you did not reply to a digest. >>>> >>>> Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying. > > And I am in absolute agreement with you!
Hm, I wonder why anyone is going to the lengths of replying to digest messages rather than just subscribing to the list ... > But then - I also believe if someone top posts there *is* something > wrong. Likewise posting in HTML. Or posting to the list because they are > unable to do something, but then insisting on rudely declaring how > something must be done (and still expecting respect). Here or anywhere else, indeed. I´m seeing badly designed followups way too often. Some people don´t even use quote marks so that it becomes indistinguishable who says what or what someone is refering to. I wish there was a way to automatically detect such followups to automatically lower their scores and have them not displayed anymore. Do you know of a good reference that teaches people how to post I could point to in my signature? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iprym0cb.fsf...@yun.yagibdah.de
