On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 03:07:13PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 22:42, René Seindal wrote: > > I just got these messages from smartmontools on my laptop. I checked > > the logs because the disk make a weird sound. > > > > Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. > > This one might actually be harmless if you always got it and get it a lot. It > probably just means that your drive doesn't provide that information.
Here's a series of the messages. I just noticed that the Load_Cycle_Count messages come with 30 minutes intervals, so it might be a lack of understanding between the drive and smartd. The Spin_Up_Time messages are explainable, I think. Excessive variation in Spin_Up_Time can be an indacator of a failing spindle motor, but the value is consistently between 110-130, and usually around 115-120, so I take that to be stable. The drive, BTW, is hda: IBM-DJSA-220, ATA DISK drive hda: 39070080 sectors (20004 MB) w/1874KiB Cache, CHS=38760/16/63, UDMA(33) The messages are: Sep 24 22:55:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 24 23:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 24 23:55:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 00:25:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 00:55:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 01:25:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 01:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 02:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 02:55:16: Device: /dev/hda, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 3 Spin_Up_Time changed from 121 to 119 Sep 25 02:55:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 03:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 03:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 04:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 04:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 3 Spin_Up_Time changed from 119 to 115 Sep 25 04:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 05:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 05:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 06:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 06:55:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 07:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 07:55:19: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 08:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 08:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 09:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 09:55:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 10:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 10:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 11:25:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 11:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 3 Spin_Up_Time changed from 115 to 123 Sep 25 11:55:17: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 12:25:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 12:55:15: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. Sep 25 13:25:16: Device: /dev/hda, Failed SMART usage Attribute: 193 Load_Cycle_Count. > > Device: /dev/hda, SMART Usage Attribute: 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate changed > > from 99 to 98 > > This one might be more serious. But from what I've seen at > http://yusoft.kulichki.com/russian/doc/smartdoc.htm > (translations anyone?), it has to do with G-forces (as in acceleration) > exerted on the drive, and if you didn't drop it it shouldn't be of much > importance. I had it on my lap, and might have moved it a bit briskly. It did make a weird sound, but there have been no other errors since. Anyway, I'm quite a bit calmer now, but I will keep an eye on the drive in the time to come. As for backup, it is a development machine I use at home, and everything I have there is mirrored on other computers or in CVS. I not too afraid of losing data, rather about losing time. > > > What do these messages mean and do I need to buy a new harddisk? > > In any case, have a look at smartctl and its documentation. Get the logged > information and see if any of the parameters is out of bounds. If so, > double-check that your drive is not transmitting the data backwards (some > Samsung drives do which lead to an error count >300,000 on one of my drives). > Many manufacturers also offer proprietary tools that work from a bootfloppy > and know what the drive is talking about. > > There's some more information at > http://www.siguardian.com/products/siguardian/on_line_help/ > s_m_a_r_t_attribute_meaning.html > but it's rather incomplete due to the industry's usual "don't tell" attitude. > > Most important: DON'T PANIC. There's a strong tendency on this list to send > people shopping as soon as there's any message in the logs concerning > harddrives; take those with a large grain of salt unless a proper explanation > is offered. > -- René Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://sights.seindal.dk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]