On 06/12/11 at 02:45am, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > This is a bit strange: > > gcj-4.6-jre-lib 4.6.0-4 has the following dependencies: > > Depends: gcj-4.6-base (>= 4.6.0-12), libgcj12 (>= 4.6.0-12) > > However gcj-4.6-jre-lib, gcj-4.6-base and libgcj12 all have the same > source gcj-4.6. So, I wonder whether the above makes sense
Why not? Are you suggesting that sharing a source package means they shouldn't depend on each other? This is a common occurrence. > (currently gcj-4.6-jre-lib is uninstallable because all the available > versions are 4.6.0-4). If there's a bug with dependencies, file a ticket. Unless you're in testing. > Can a binary package have a different version from the corresponding source > package version? The fields don't have to match, but the versions will never (AFAIK) differ. -- Liam
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
