On Mi, 01 iun 11, 19:32:06, lrhorer wrote: > Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > On Mi, 01 iun 11, 07:56:58, lrhorer wrote: > >> > >> Oh! I see. It's not a binary, at all. The init scripts just source > >> the function. Thanks! (I'd still like to know how `pidof` got > >> mangled.) > > > > Please post the output of 'dpkg -l sysvinit-utils' > > Um, OK. Why?
Because $ dpkg -S bin/pidof sysvinit-utils: /bin/pidof > RAID-Server:/etc/init.d# dpkg -l sysvinit-utils > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig- > aWait/Trig-pend > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version > Description > +++-==================================- > ==================================- > ==================================================================================== > ii sysvinit-utils 2.88dsf-13.1 > System-V-like utilities dpkg thinks the package is ok. Since "loosing" binaries is a bit unusual I would suggest fsck-ing your file systems and running SMART tests on your harddisk. You do have backups, right? Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
