Am 10.05.2011 14:15, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > On 5/10/2011 6:17 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: >> Am 10.05.2011 12:20, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >>> On 5/10/2011 3:45 AM, Markus Neviadomski wrote: >>> >>>> Hello list,
> > The problem wasn't' what you wrote but the formatting. It appeared to > have no line wrapping, or some similar issue. OK...it was Thunderbird. I kicks them in the ass! > >>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-875903-start-0.html > >> You are right, i didnt read every release note. If i would do that, i >> will get my money only for reading text files. Libata may be responsible >> for the different device identifier, but i found no example to use the >> drive uuids in mdadm-conf. > > Then you didn't read the information at the link I posted directly above. You didnt understand me, because i was wrong. Thinking each raid device has different uuid, but i see for every part of the raid the uuid is identical. > >> Its annoying, that the cfcard is sometimes sda und sometimes sde. This >> should be fixed! > > It is fixed. Using drive UUIDs fixes it. For mdadm, yes this should. > >> This is my mdadm.conf, using a UUID since a long time. >> saturn:/home/domski# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf >> DEVICE partitions >> ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 spares=1 >> UUID=4105560e:bf03b97e:ba419cbc:b7000e73 >> MAILADDR root > > If you were already using UUIDs then you need to take this up on the > mdadm mailing list, not here, as the problem you actually have is not > the one you originally described. Yes, now i think this is the right decision. My first attempt was to fix the sda/sde apperance for sd-card, so mdadm.conf should configured with sd* devices. Thanks, Markus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc93d41.6040...@dieitexperten.de
