On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 08:58, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:48:44AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 06:28, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=4.0 > > > tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, > > > REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,X_LOOP, > > > X_MAILING_LIST > > > autolearn=ham version=2.55 > > > > > > (This is from your message) > > > > Nope. > > I meant it is how (my) spamassassin classified the message.
Yes, I know. I mean that I don't have anything like that in any of my mails, neither ham nor spam. (But the spams get quarantined and I get a SPAM FROM email from amavisd-new, so that doesn't bother me.) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA "Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse." Larry Wall, 10/14/1998 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
