On Sunday 03 April 2011 16:52:14 Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:35:08 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Sunday 03 April 2011 16:15:05 Camaleón wrote: > >> Is the "ping" success if you run it as root? > > > > No! Herewith 1 specimen: > > > > Tux:/home/lisi# ping 192.168.0.3 > > Try to ping machine .33 (ping -c 3 192.168.0.33)
Thanks for persevering, Camaleón. machine .33 would be the third DHCP number allocated by the router. It does not currently exist. I could find three machines to connect by DHCP, if the third would make a difference of some kind! > > And also the reverse, from "Dozy" try to ping "Tux" (ping -c 3 > 192.168.0.2). Wow! Could you explain how you knew that? I might recognise it myself another time!! peter@Dozy:~$ ping 192.168.0.2 PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.95 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.27 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.224 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.27 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.221 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.164 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.28 ms ^C --- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6009ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.164/1.056/2.951/0.920 ms peter@Dozy:~$ To repeat myself! Thank you. I really appreciate it. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104031733.04788.lisi.re...@gmail.com
