On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:06:51 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:34:32 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks to everyone who responded !
> > 
> > That explains everything.  I changed motherboards out from under the
> > system.  So it appended the new eth to the old ones.
> > 
> > It seems to me that this is a really ugly user trap, even if it's a
> > trap you get into replacing the old motherboard.
> 
> Yes, if the motherboard contains a built-in network interface, as
> many of them do, then replacing the motherboard has the same effect
> on network interface name assignments as if you had replaced a NIC
> card. The built-in network interface has a different MAC address than
> the old one, and that's how udev assigns interface names: by MAC
> address.  You can get rid of your home-made udev rule.  This can also
> occur if you (1) move the hard drive from one machine to another, (2)
> backup from one computer and restore to another, etc.  It seems that
> everyone gets burned by this at least once.  But once you find the
> solution, you never forget it.
> 

lol, that's for sure !

Brian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110331193940.51a24...@windy.deldotd.com

Reply via email to