On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:11:47 -0700, giovanni_re wrote: (...)
> I don't know that the correct name should be, but I can think of several > _ways to analyse it_. > > a) Because it's best to have one name, we should avoid the main name > being a set of names, based on the processor - a kind of naming scheme > you (implicitly) raised. > > b) The "descriptive" naming convention would compell something like > "DfACHP", but that is a rather clunky name. That name is rather > unpronouncable, which is why I first suggested the acronym name without > the "C", DfAHP. But, that's still a clunky name. > > c) WWSJNI? [What Would Steve Jobs Name It?] - That would be the catchy, > marketing oriented name. Also, that might be like what Ubuntu might > name something. > > Maybe something like "Debian4Smartphones". "SmartphoneDebian". ? Hum... I vote for "Debianoid" :-P Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.03.29.17.16...@gmail.com
