Christoph Simon writes: > One thing is to double prices and expose them _before_ you pay, and > another thing is to double prices you suddenly have to pay in > disagreement with a former contract. Maybe you are a lawyer, but for my > taste, these things stink like hell.
That's got nothing to do with the monopoly question. > Personally, I can't understand what is legal if two parties agree to a > set of conditions, that one part can change these conditions arbitrarily, > leaving the other with the choices of not getting any service or > accepting the abuse. Sounds like a contract dispute. Don't you have any civil courts? > Maybe this is legal, but it stinks. I can't do that. Telefónica can. That's not monopoly. That's corruption. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
