On Thursday 17 March 2011 15:09:26 Krzysztof Bieniasz wrote: > > As I default to LibO rather than OOo, the removal of OOo is just fine. > > However, the upgrade did confuse me, because if it is removing OOo, I'm > > > > not sure why OOo packages are also being upgraded: > > The following packages will be upgraded: <snip> > > > > openoffice.org openoffice.org-base openoffice.org-common > > openoffice.org-gcj openoffice.org-gnome openoffice.org-help-en-gb > > openoffice.org-help-en-us openoffice.org-l10n-en-gb > > openoffice.org-officebean <snip> > > > > which results then in unresolved dependencies: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libreoffice-debian-menus: Conflicts: libreoffice-bundled which is > > > > a virtual package. > > > > ure: Breaks: openoffice.org-core (< 1:3.3~) but > > > > 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2 is installed. > > > > The following actions will resolve these dependencies: > > Remove the following packages: > > 1) libreoffice-debian-menus > > 2) openoffice.org-core > > 3) openoffice.org-evolution > > > > Anyway, thanks again for the assist. > > > > AG > > OOo are being upgraded because there are new versions of these packages > in the repos. Only that they don't provide OOo anymore -- they've been > changed to transitional metapackages, depending on libreoffice packages. > Once you have libreoffice you can remove them since you won't be needing > them anymore. In fact you could purge OOo first and then install LibO. > That should take care of the dependancies. >
No; libreoffice isn't complete yet and still relay on a few packages from openoffice. I tried to remove them, but then it want to pull out libreoffice as well. Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103172321.04785.tchate...@free.fr
