On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:35:04 -0600, Kent West wrote: > On 02/17/2011 12:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> LILO is another bootloader available for Linux. >> >> What was your concern? The sponsor? :-) >> >> >> >> > LILO was the boot loader used a version or few back. It can still be > used, but it's no longer the default on Debian installations. The first Linux I installed (that was back to 2003) defaulted to GRUB as bootloader and GRUB (legacy) is the only bootloader I've installed -and tweaked- since then. While I've seen "LILOs" when testing another distributions, true is that I have not a deep knowdledge of how it works. But, for what I've read, LILO is still requested for some complex booting environments where GRUB has some difficulty and OTOH, I think is a very good approach to keep the two most used bootloaders in a good shape. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.17.19.07...@gmail.com
