On Monday 14 February 2011 15:50:30 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > that is not the point. For myself I am using testing as well. My opinion > and my thoughts are these: using stable (with the premisse "things will > not change during the next 2 years except of security issues") is outdated > today.
If you don't need it, don't run it. I find stable *incredibly* valuable. Sometimes the preparation of stable does hurt testing and unstable users -- during a freeze. This is unfortunate, and I hope that CUT and other projects find a way to let testing and unstable users get what they want in a distribution even during a freeze. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
