On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:04:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Sb, 12 feb 11, 13:40:58, Camaleón wrote: >> >> So, should people running "sid" also add the whole "testing" repo under >> all circumstances (as default policy) or just when some package is >> broken and is in the need of back to the previous version or something >> is missing? :-? > > Can you think of a case where having testing in sources.list can hurt on > a sid machine?
No (maybe it would require to play with repositories priorities), but I also find not good reasons to have it both enabled "by default", unless you fall into a very specific situation that it requires. Being a fast- moving repository, "unstable" should be "healed" by itself very quickly. Anyway, all in all I find this is more a user's decision. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.12.14.49...@gmail.com
