On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 15:43:50 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Spaces make no difference in the old aptitude search form and the new
> search form leads to the same result:
>
> on another mixed system I get
>
> apt-show-versions | grep -c /experimental
> 35
>
> aptitude search '~S ~i ~Aexperimental' | wc -l
> 27
>
> aptitude search '~S~i~Aexperimental' | wc -l
> 27
>
> aptitude search "?narrow(?archive(experimental),?installed)" | wc -l
> 27
>
> An example of a package not found by these aptitude search commands is
> (output from apt-show-versions)
> xserver-xorg-core/experimental *manually* upgradeable from 2:1.9.2.902-1
> to 2:1.9.3.902-1
I think the above aptitude searches do not list such packages because
the ~A string is empty for their installed version, which is no longer
in experimental.
I use
aptitude search '~S~i!~Ae'
to find all my outdated packages that came from experimental. This will
also list the obsolete (~o) packages and it relies on the fact that all
archive names from stable to experimental contain at least one "e". You
can combine this with '!~o' to exclude the "standard" obsolete packages;
I use the above search string as a display limit in interactive mode,
where these two types of packages are listed in different categories
anyway ("upgradable" and "obsolete", respectively).
--
Regards, |
Florian | http://www.florian-kulzer.eu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110201155844.ga28...@bavaria.univ-lyon1.fr
