On 28/01/11 22:30, Daniel Andersson wrote: > On 01/28/2011 06:14 PM, elbbit wrote: >> On 28/01/11 16:26, Robert Bonomi wrote: <removed 5335 bytes>
> What the hell? > > Start your own thread next time elbitt. This is not what I wanted to > discuss with this thread. > > /Daniel Thank you for taking the time to give us your view. Talking about spam is not what I wanted either. I wanted to talk about the fact that everyone is invited to vote on any issue at any time, and retain the ability to change their mind at any time. If you back track the thread you will find that others chose to decide to talk about spam. I invite anyone to talk about the possibilities that may present themselves in such a survey software like the one I have begun to develop. What are the implications of everyone voting? What security measures should we take to safeguard the data set? What about validity of results - should fresh opinion be requested from users who give their vote or would it be best if older votes on a particular subject where to "die off" from inactivity? I would like any help the community feels it can offer, even if this is in the form of ridicule and slander - and I understand *in advance* that this is necessary in order to develop an idea so profound that I endure the comments in order to achieve. Simon -- elbbit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d43534c.4010...@gmail.com
