On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:54:53AM -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:34:23 +0100 > Klistvud <quotati...@aliceadsl.fr> wrote: > > > Dne, 12. 01. 2011 17:23:27 je François TOURDE napisal(a): > > > Le 14986ième jour après Epoch, > > > Klistvud écrivait: > > > > > > > Dne, 12. 01. 2011 14:07:53 je Kleene, Nancy (kleenenl) napisal(a): > > > >> Please ignore this test. > > > > > > > > Ignoring. > > > > > > > > Please ignore this reply. > > > > > > Should we ignore you've replied, or should we ignore that you've > > > ignored > > > the first msg? > > > > > > It's confusing ;) ... Oh, ignore it :P > > > > Well, replying to your question wouldn't be ignoring, now, would it? > > > > So, I'll just keep ignoring. > > > This thread has become 'ignore' rant. >
If a thread is posted to a listserv, and everyone ignores it, does Godwin's law apply? -- Patrick Ouellette p...@flying-gecko.net ne4po (at) arrl (dot) net Amateur Radio: NE4PO What kind of change have you been in the world today? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110112180441.ga4...@flying-gecko.net
