At Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:08:51 +0200,One difference not mentioned yet is that the "for f in" solution will work on files in the current directory while the "find" solution will recurse through subdirectories. If using find I would also add a "-type f" so you don't end up trying to run sed on directories.
Matthias Czapla wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:39:39AM -0700, Ric Otte wrote:
Hi, I would like to run all of the files in some directorieshttp://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro-HOWTO.html
through sed, in order to edit the files. I can do it for
individual files by typing: cat filename|sed command>filename
But that requires me to run that command for each file. I
was wondering if anyone could 1) give me a reference to a
simple bash tutorial that will explain how to set up a script
to do things like this,
and 2) tell me how to do it.for f in *; do tmp=`tempfile`; cat $f | sed command > $tmp ; mv $tmp $f; done
Is there anything intrinsically wrong with:
find directory -name "*.foo" | xargs sed -i -f sed_script
Regards, Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]