08/12/2010 14:46, Paul Cartwright wrote: >> On 12/08/2010 03:44 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: >> Overall chromium has a small edge, but not very noticeable here. I use >> both happily anyway ! >> > what about Opera.. just asking :) > >
Well, what about it then ? ;-) I don't use Opera since "aptitude install opera" doesn't work, and I am lazy, and also a bit worried to do my web browsing with a closed source browser (which include built-in p2p "sharing" feature as I read ?). I gave it a quick try out of curiosity (didn't like the way it drops a file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d without displaying a blood red warning to ask me if I was willing to accept it, seems to be a trend, google is doing the same). First my eyes popped out: t...@deblove:~$ smem -nktP [o]pera PID User Command USS PSS RSS 5662 1000 /usr/lib/opera//operaplugin 148.0K 165.0K 884.0K 5661 1000 /usr/lib/opera//operaplugin 19.9M 20.5M 26.0M 5367 1000 /usr/lib/opera/opera 171.5M 172.6M 187.6M 5796 1000 /usr/lib/opera//operaplugin 201.1M 204.4M 214.8M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 107 1 392.7M 397.6M 429.2M t...@deblove:~$ smem -nktP [c]hromium PID User Command USS PSS RSS 6646 1000 /usr/lib/chromium-browser/c 1.0M 5.2M 15.9M 6752 1000 /usr/lib/chromium-browser/c 46.4M 50.9M 69.1M 6644 1000 /usr/lib/chromium-browser/c 46.2M 55.4M 84.6M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 107 1 93.6M 111.4M 169.7M Then after investigating the situation it appeared that java plug-in is loaded for no good reason in Opera and sucks up a lot of memory, sometimes only. Here is a result when java isn't interfering : t...@deblove:~$ smem -nktP [o]pera PID User Command USS PSS RSS 8222 1000 /usr/lib/opera//operaplugin 144.0K 167.0K 880.0K 8221 1000 /usr/lib/opera//operaplugin 82.9M 85.3M 93.5M 7933 1000 /usr/lib/opera/opera 154.0M 155.1M 168.9M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 91 1 237.0M 240.6M 263.3M Keep in mind that I didn't reset my default chromium profile, so it has several extensions Opera doesn't have. Every "blocker" extension in chromium was disabled though (flash and adds). Opera is slower when loading the same tabs set, especially heavy flash content. On the good side it showed the best behaviour when it comes to java applet test (a secure bank login applet), but consumed crazy amounts of memory in this situation (blame is more on Java I guess). Chromium just fails on the java applet test, maybe due to a rejected user agent string ? Opera version was 10.63.6450, chromium is from experimental version 9.0.587.0~r66374-1. System is Squeeze/Sid/experimental amd64, flash is native amd64 "square" beta. This is Iceweasel (experimental 3.6.12-2) on the same tabs set: t...@deblove:~$ smem -nktP [f]irefox PID User Command USS PSS RSS 9203 1000 /usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox- 139.9M 145.9M 162.6M ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 77 1 139.9M 145.9M 162.6M If we want to do something like a debian-user-list-browser-benchmark we should agree on a list of urls to test with, maybe 10-12 tabs should be enough, tools and protocol. I won't give my list since it includes my Christmas shopping, my bank, and a few controversial politicly incorrect urls like http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/SpaceFun ;-) (love what they did). Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfff8ac.5020...@googlemail.com
