On 2010-11-20 21:28 +0100, Borden Rhodes wrote: > Once again, Sven, I owe you my sanity. I've read that Debian was still > looking into framebuffer issues with Intel, whether to keep UMS or > migrate to KMS. Is that debate related to the DRI/shadow issue?
Well, yes. The attempt to reenable UMS didn't solve the problems and was abandoned, current -intel packages require KMS and use a shadowfb on i8xxx hardware by default (the latter is a Debian-specific patch, upstream's default is not to enable shadow on any hardware). Not pretty, but better solutions have simply not been found. :-( Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vd3ryaqf....@turtle.gmx.de
