On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Angus Hedger <demide...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:36:50 +0200 > Matteo Riva <mura...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <anippy> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> fglrx-driver: Conflicts: nvidia-glx but 195.36.24-4 is to be >> installed. xserver-xorg-core: Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-2 which is a >> virtual package. Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-cyrix (<= 1:1.1.0-8) >> but 1:1.1.0-8 is to be installed. >> Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-nsc (<= 1:2.8.3-4) but >> 1:2.8.3-4 is to be installed. >> fglrx-glx: Conflicts: nvidia-glx but 195.36.24-4 is to be installed. >> nvidia-glx: Conflicts: fglrx-glx but 1:10-7-1 is to be installed. >> >> but I can't understand why it's installing fglrx-driver or nvidia-glx >> >> An aptitude why on those packages shows: >> >> $ aptitude why fglrx-driver >> i gnome Depends gdm3 | gdm-themes >> p gdm3 Recommends xserver-xorg >> p A xserver-xorg Depends xserver-xorg-video-all | >> xserver-xorg-video-6 p fglrx-driver Provides xserver-xorg-video-6 >> >> aptitude why nvidia-glx >> i gnome Depends gdm3 | gdm-themes >> p gdm3 Recommends xserver-xorg >> p A xserver-xorg Depends xserver-xorg-video-all | >> xserver-xorg-video-6 p nvidia-glx Provides xserver-xorg-video-6 >> >> so it seems they are installed since they provide >> 'xserver-xorg-video-6' BUT I already have >> 'xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd' which provides the same package, so why >> does aptitude want to install the proprietary display drivers? > > Not sure, try opening aptitude in and cancelling all pending actions. > > sudo aptitude then press e or click actions > cancel pending actions.
Apparently there are no pending actions, I still can't understand why those packages are being installed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinyuknn=es8bgbygxqp9fb5e+u=cjdsfhsdc...@mail.gmail.com
