> > > >---- Original Message ---- >From: jesus.nava...@undominio.net >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >Subject: Re: Re (2): Linux hub >Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:10:55 +0200 > >>Hi, owens: >> >>On Tuesday 07 September 2010 01:08:40 ow...@netptc.net wrote: >>[...] >> >>> Boyd >>> I'm not disagreeing with you in practice but many years ago these >>> WERE the definitions the ITU and ISO dealt with. IIRC it was the >>> vendors who screwed things up by introducing such products as >>> "swithcing hub" >> >>For one time this is not because of marketing: a "switch" *is* a >switching hub >>just as a "hub" is a multiport repeater. They are just plain >descriptions of >>what they do. >> >> >>-- >>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org >>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >listmas...@lists.debian.org >>Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009071610.55390.jesus.nava...@un >dominio.net >> Somewhat OT but I found more modern "definitions" of these terms in the IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms (I have the Sixth Edition) Larry >>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/380-2201092718838...@netptc.net
