On 20100710_103920, Tom H wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Camale?n <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:27:03 -0400, Tom H wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Camale?n wrote: > > > >>> But it have been desiderable to name it "GRUB2" or something like that > >>> to prevent old GRUB users to be more confused than they are now with 2 > >>> GRUBs in play :-) > >> > >> This is the same url as the previous (grub1) manual, so as far as gnu is > >> concerned, there must only be one grub... > > > > How bad! :-( > > > > There are still people using Grub legacy and online manual is very useful > > (i.e., for pointing someone to a specific paragraph or give it a quick > > review). > > True. You can still access the google-cache of the grub1 manual.
Tom, How long will the google-cache of this information be available? Things in Debian don't move on google/internet time, IMHO. They are generally much slower. Some people will still be struggling with systems that use the older versions long after Google had given them much lower status. In order to help those who are stragglers in the rush to the future, it would be nice if you could put a hotlink to the GRUB Legacy manual, which is archived at gnu.org directly after its first mention (which is in the History section of your document) -- Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100710164005.gb2...@big.lan.gnu
