On Lu, 28 iun 10, 13:38:47, Arthur Machlas wrote: > >> 1) ext2 to image / from my debian install. 50GB so I could have two or > >> three "snapshots" > > > > Why ext2? I don't see any reason to use something less than ext3 for > > "regular" operations. > > > > Ext2 because who needs journaling? It will have three, maybe four > files on it, each about 10GB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't > think anything else out there is as fast as ext2, when it comes to > writing large files.
AFAIK ext4 and xfs are optimized for large files... Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
