> If, we consider that the environment has changed; we have Red Hut,
> Ubuntu and Suse; pushing to include every thing into the kernel, what
> is the best for them, then we have a huge kernel; which is not the
> best for older ordenators, but it is the best for newer boxes. As we
> can see, Linus is been pushed to built a huger kernel.
Actually, the Linux kernel has seen a lot of work done to make it
adaptable to small systems (think home-routers, embedded systems, cell
phones, ...).
It's just the desktop-distros that use big kitchen-sink kernels, because
that suits them better.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/jwvzkzk3jv2.fsf-monnier+gmane.linux.debian.u...@gnu.org
