On Wednesday 26 May 2010 17:16:57 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote: > > A poster rightly noted that chromium is NOT google chrome. > > > > > > > > Installed it (still in 5.****). Looks like Google's. Taste's like > > it. I do believe it loads up noticeably faster (was not that the > > whole point of chromium in the first place?). Flash seems more > > reliable as well (I understand why Apple prefers to avoid it!). > > > > > > > > So before I decide which one to keep, how can I get them to share > > the same configuration, options, extensions, etc. Doing that will > > enable a real comparison? Where do they keep this data? > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ChromiumBrowserVsGoogleChrome
Note corrected subject. This WIKI is very helpful, thanks. I symlinked chromium's to google's and seems OK (have a save just in case). Two main differences: Translations -- Google's gets in the way unless one sets the option to not automatically offer translation. There are extensions including google's own which might get translation into chromium. Will try. Chromium comes up working much faster. Apparently google-chrome is searching apt-cache as nauseum on start and is blocked at this point. Probably looking for plugins or something else. Opera was my former choice but also takes forever to come up. At least google-chrome shows itself before blocking. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005261858.06664.d_ba...@012.net.il
