On 2010-05-15 11:04 +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
>> [readelf output]
>>
>> ELF Header:
>> [...]
>
>> INTERP 0x000114 0x08048114 0x08048114 0x00011 0x00011 R 0x1
>> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3]
>
> That dynamic linker doesn't look right. A little googling shows that
> Redhat and Suse seem to be using that one now. A missing linker is,
> by the way, the only other reason for execve() to return ENOENT ("file
> not found") I know of - missing dependencies produce a different error.
>
> Anyway, Debian still has /lib/ld-linux.so.2 - you could try symlinking
> them, but I doubt it will work.
Why not? Do you think that Redhat and Suse do something else? Anyway,
this symlink should be in the lsb-core package; it was added in 3.0.6
(see #326609¹) but seems to have gone AWOL since then.
Sven
¹ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326609
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aas1r0fc....@turtle.gmx.de
