On Wednesday 12 May 2010 17:07:09 Nick Douma wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:44:12PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 May 2010 16:27:08 Nick Douma wrote: > > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:24:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2010 04:16 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > >> Added Tag: needs-to-be-in-release-notes > > > > > > > > To heck with the Release Notes! This needs to be front and center > > > > when you when you do the "apt-get update". > > > > > > It does appear when you do the aptitude full-upgrade, but it doesn't > > > block the output, it just shoots by. > > > > > > I do wonder how they will handle this when squeeze gets stable. The > > > whole update your kernel, reboot, update the rest is a bit too easy to > > > fuck up for my taste. I completely assumed that I could just change the > > > apt sources.list and do the full-upgrade. > > > > You should *always* read the release notes first. It is actually rather > > rare that a release just needs an 'aptitude full-upgrade'. Usually, > > perl, apt, aptitude, or dpkg should be updated first. > > Well, I did try to look for release notes, but I did not find any for > Squeeze.
Yeah, they usually don't get worked on until after the testing freeze. They will be fairly complete by the time Squeeze is released. Until then, you are on your own; upgrades from stable to testing are sometimes tested throughout the stable life cycle, but all the issues aren't addressed until it's better known what will actually be in the new stable. If you want testing, best to install testing, really. Stable and the upgrade is possible, but it's actually slower. (It might be the best way is the testing d-i is broken, though.) -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
