on Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:23:43PM -0400, Johan Kullstam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:27:47PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > > Can anyone advise on starting to use SiD as resource for my Debian > > > Workstation ? Doesn't it have to many issues left open, broken > > > dependencies etc. > > > > If you have to ask, sid is not stable enough for you. > > Perhaps his video card isn't supported with the woody shipped xfree86? > That's why I went straight for sid last August. (ATI Radeon 8500 > needs 4.2.1.) At work I just got some crap corporate box with i845g > graphics. I need xfree86 4.3. Please advise.
1. Report this problem to your video card vendor. I don't care if
you're CTO of IBM or a one-week-temp and Spam-R-Us or Joe's Internet
Taco Cafe. Vendors need to know that their customers are using
their products with GNU/Linux, and demand XFree86 support. Do this
regardless of any subsequent steps you take to resolve your problem.
2. Consider the option of using a supported card. It's not going to
cost much -- last time I tried this trick, it consisted of walking
into CompUSA and asking for the lowest-end video card they had
(suitable for most office work; who are you kidding about your
Gnumeric FPS score), cost was on the order of $25. Submit the
receipt for reimbursement, and pass along _this_ request to your
internal purchase manager or whitebox vendor. Cannibalizing an
existing dead box might get you the card for free.
3. Go ahead and use 'testing'. You're insulated from most of the
borkenness of unstable. Using 'pinning' and apt preferences, you
can include unstable and testing sources, pull from testing by
preference, but install selected unstable packages on an as-needed
basis. This is what I do. It works most of the time. Note that
using pinning to bridge the testing/unstable gap works pretty well
(they're relatively close), but bridging stable to either testing or
unstable is a real mess. In the latter case, you're trying to
bridge 1-2 years of software development, often with large
changes in basic foundations.
Based on two minutes' hunting through Google and Google Groups, you're
going to need XF86 v 4.3, which may not yet be in testing, but is
available via unofficial debs from http://www.apt-get.org
http://tinyurl.com/mhvh
The general answer is this:
GNU/Linux remains disadvantaged by hardware support policies, many
of which have been historically shown to be influenced improperly by
Microsoft. Free software is a powerful tool for circumventing this
situation, but it requires a positive response on your part:
telling the vendor that you want support, researching whether and
how support is available, and taking necessary steps to configure
your system. If you're not willing to do this, then you're better
off sticking to known supported hardware, or accepting the rule of
an illegal software monopoly over your computing platform.
Resistance isn't painless. It has its rewards.
If you're going to pioneer Debian GNU/Linux at your workplace, you'll
have to balance:
- Accepting supplied HW and current levels of support.
- Risking the slightly less stable world of testing or unstable
releases of Debian.
- Learning something about your tools.
- Using alternative hardware where necessary.
Inflexibility on all four points on your part isn't a problem on ours.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Hollings: bought, paid for, but couldn't deliver the CBDTPA:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/cbdtpa/hollings.s2048.032102.html
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
