Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:09:05:18:04:02+0100] scribed:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:27:56AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:09:05:02:37:15-0700] scribed:
> > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:23:49PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > Bug #208806
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Although I could have done the same, I thought I'd confer with the
> > list, in case I'm missing some rationale for this behaviour . . .
> > 
> 
> The lines in 60_whitelist.cf use whitelist_from_rcvd so that they are
> checking the Received: headers for a amazon.com mail server for instance.
> A message that simply uses the domain name in an address wouldn't be
> whitelisted would it?

man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf

   whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
   Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with a check
   against the Received headers. The first parameter is the address to
   whitelist, and the second is a domain to match in the Received
   headers.  This domain does not allow globbing, and must be followed
   by a numeric IP address in brackets in the Received headers.

> I'm not sure where I read about this (I not even sure I did read it
> given I can't find it anymore :-( ) but isn't the point of this list
> that these sites don't send bulk mail unless you didn't opted-out (or you
> actually opted-in) and will remove you from their list if you ask?
> 
> Maybe I'm just lucky but I can't remember any spam from amazon.com even
> after purchasing several dead trees from them.

I do not recall ever having opted-in for anything from amazon.com,
although, there could have been some option that defaulted to spamming
me, that I forgot to un-set ;>

Regarding orbitz.com, I know that I did *not* opt-in, and I receive spam
several times per week.

Also, as a matter of principle, I do *not* offer my email address in any
after-the-fact opt-out process.

-- 
Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to